RE: OT - Small DNS "appliances" for remote offices.

[Peter Loron <peterl () standingwave org>]

For any site where you would use a Pi as the DNS cache, it won't be an 
issue. DNS isn't that heavy at those query rates.

Yeah, it would be awesome if they'd been able to get a SoC that included 
ethernet.

-Pete

On 2015-02-18 15:08, Robert Webb wrote:
> What I do not like about the Pi is the network port is on the USB bus
> and thus limited to USB speeds. 
>
> <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Maxwell Cole
> <mcole.mailinglists () gmail com> </div><div>Date:02/18/2015  4:30 PM
> (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: "nanog () nanog org >> 'NANOG list'"
> <nanog () nanog org> </div><div>Subject: Re: OT - Small DNS "appliances"
> for remote offices. </div><div>
> </div>