nanog mailing list archives

Re: Low cost WDM gear


From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 13:34:29 -0600 (CST)

Oh, I had no fantasies that the $500 Chinese muxes would do the distance. Actually quite the opposite in that I knew 
they couldn't, so looking for alternative solutions that didn't break the bank. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Mark Tinka" <mark.tinka () seacom mu> 
To: nanog () nanog org 
Sent: Saturday, February 7, 2015 1:26:28 PM 
Subject: Re: Low cost WDM gear 


On 7/Feb/15 21:17, Phil Bedard wrote: 
Is this for 10G? I'm kind of assuming 10G. What kind of equipment is 
being plugged into these? 300km is way beyond what you'll get with a 
passive solution, it's definitely in the "long-haul" terrtory. If you are 
launching out of a router the best pluggable optic you can generally get 
is rated at 80km, 10GBase-ZR, but even a passive mux at each end shaves 
some of that distance off. 

300km is going to require amplifiers at intervals across the span. Who is 
providing the fiber? I'd start talking to traditional transport vendors. 
Ekinops as mentioned is probably decent at a lower price, Adva works well 
and isn't all that expensive, even Cisco has gear reasonably priced. If 
you want to cover 300km on a fiber span though "cheap" isn't really a word 
I would describe. It's why people lease circuits. :) 

Agree - US$500 (or thereabout) to cover 300km at a reasonable speed with 
some reliability and manageability is a stretch (no pun intended). 

Mark. 



Current thread: