nanog mailing list archives
Re: Checkpoint IPS
From: "Roland Dobbins" <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 23:08:31 +0700
On 6 Feb 2015, at 21:27, Darden, Patrick wrote:
I understand the whole argument against state, and dismiss it.
One can 'dismiss' the speed of light in a vacuum or the Planck constant, but that doesn't exempt one from their constraints.
----------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>
Current thread:
- Re: Checkpoint IPS, (continued)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Terry Baranski (Feb 05)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Roland Dobbins (Feb 05)
- RE: Checkpoint IPS Terry Baranski (Feb 05)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Roland Dobbins (Feb 05)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Patrick Tracanelli (Feb 05)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Ray Soucy (Feb 06)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Roland Dobbins (Feb 06)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Patrick Tracanelli (Feb 06)
- RE: Re: Checkpoint IPS Darden, Patrick (Feb 06)
- RE: Re: Checkpoint IPS Darden, Patrick (Feb 06)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Roland Dobbins (Feb 06)
- RE: Re: Checkpoint IPS Darden, Patrick (Feb 06)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Roland Dobbins (Feb 06)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Ca By (Feb 07)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS BPNoC Group (Feb 08)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Roland Dobbins (Feb 08)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Colin Johnston (Feb 06)
- RE: Re: Checkpoint IPS Darden, Patrick (Feb 06)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Colin Johnston (Feb 06)
- RE: Re: Checkpoint IPS Darden, Patrick (Feb 06)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Colin Johnston (Feb 06)