nanog mailing list archives

Re: Nat

From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:07:49 +0900

It seems like NAT would be another way to make IPv4 more painful to
use.


it is.  but, judging by people's actions, in many cases it seems less
painful than going to ipv6.  off-pissing, but reality.

randy

Current thread:

Re: Nat, (continued)
- - - Re: Nat Matthew Petach (Dec 19)
    - Re: Nat Sander Steffann (Dec 19)
    - Re: Nat Baldur Norddahl (Dec 19)
    - Re: Nat Matthew Newton (Dec 21)
    - Re: Nat A . L . M . Buxey (Dec 21)
    - Re: Nat Matthew Petach (Dec 19)
    - Re: Nat James R Cutler (Dec 19)
    - Re: Nat Nick Hilliard (Dec 19)
    - Message not available
    - Re: Nat Lee Howard (Dec 18)
    - Message not available
    - Re: Nat Larry Sheldon (Dec 16)
    - Re: Nat Randy Bush (Dec 16)
- Re: Nat Mike Hammett (Dec 20)
  - Re: Nat Daniel Corbe (Dec 20)
    - Re: Nat Matthew Petach (Dec 20)
    - Re: Nat Daniel Corbe (Dec 20)
    - Re: Nat Owen DeLong (Dec 21)
  - Re: Nat Baldur Norddahl (Dec 20)
  - Re: Nat Owen DeLong (Dec 21)
    - Re: Nat Bjørn Mork (Dec 22)
    - Re: Nat Owen DeLong (Dec 22)
    - Re: Nat James R Cutler (Dec 22)

(Thread continues...)