nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco/Level3 takedown
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 03:16:14 +0900
It does make one wonder why Cisco or Level 3 is involved, why they feel they have the authority to hijack someone else's IP space, and why they didn't go through law enforcement. This is especially true for the second netblock (43.255.190.0/23), announced by a US company (AS26484).
vigilantes always wear white hats. randy
Current thread:
- Re: macomnet weird dns record, (continued)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record Nikolay Shopik (Apr 14)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record Nikolay Shopik (Apr 14)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record William Waites (Apr 14)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record Nikolay Shopik (Apr 14)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record Colin Johnston (Apr 14)
- Message not available
- Re: macomnet weird dns record Larry Sheldon (Apr 14)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 14)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record Octavio Alvarez (Apr 14)
- Message not available
- Re: macomnet weird dns record Larry Sheldon (Apr 14)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record manning bill (Apr 14)
- Re: Cisco/Level3 takedown Mel Beckman (Apr 09)
- Re: Cisco/Level3 takedown Randy Bush (Apr 09)
- Re: Cisco/Level3 takedown jim deleskie (Apr 09)
- Re: Cisco/Level3 takedown Christopher Morrow (Apr 09)