nanog mailing list archives
Re: macomnet weird dns record
From: Nikolay Shopik <shopik () inblock ru>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 16:48:56 +0300
Then best practice, that naming should be helpful for owners of network in first place and only afterwards everyone else. On 14/04/15 16:26, Colin Johnston wrote:
Because looks strange especially if the traffic is 100% bad Best practice says avoid such info in records as does not aid debug since mix of dec and hex ColinOn 14 Apr 2015, at 14:09, Nikolay Shopik <shopik () inblock ru> wrote: How its weird? All these chars allowed in DNS records. On 14/04/15 15:36, Colin Johnston wrote:never saw hex in host dns records before. host-242.strgz.87.118.199.240.0xfffffff0.macomnet.net range is blocked non the less since bad traffic from Russia network ranges. Colin
Current thread:
- Re: macomnet weird dns record, (continued)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record Pavel Odintsov (Apr 14)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record William Herrin (Apr 14)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record Nikolay Shopik (Apr 14)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record Colin Johnston (Apr 14)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record Nikolay Shopik (Apr 14)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record Colin Johnston (Apr 14)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record Rod Beck (Apr 14)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record Nikolay Shopik (Apr 14)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record Nikolay Shopik (Apr 14)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record William Waites (Apr 14)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record Nikolay Shopik (Apr 14)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record Colin Johnston (Apr 14)
- Message not available
- Re: macomnet weird dns record Larry Sheldon (Apr 14)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 14)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record Octavio Alvarez (Apr 14)
- Message not available
- Re: macomnet weird dns record Larry Sheldon (Apr 14)
- Re: macomnet weird dns record manning bill (Apr 14)
- Re: Cisco/Level3 takedown Mel Beckman (Apr 09)
- Re: Cisco/Level3 takedown Randy Bush (Apr 09)
- Re: Cisco/Level3 takedown jim deleskie (Apr 09)