nanog mailing list archives
Re: Scotland ccTLD?
From: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner () nic-naa net>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:16:04 -0700
On 9/17/14 9:10 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
iso3166-1 is not restricted to political jurisdictions, e.g., a "nation-state". there are about a dozen regional intellectual property organizations which have been allocated iso3166-1 code points, along with quite a few bits of postage stamp trivia, my favorites being those that have no human residents, some have been recently withdrawn.----- Original Message -----From: "David Conrad" <drc () virtualized org> Right. Similarly, .SU has been assigned. SU is a bit odd in the sense that it was moved to “transitionally reserved” when the Soviet Union broke up and a batch of new country codes were created (e.g., RU, UA, etc.) and then, in 2007 (or so) it was moved from “transitionally reserved” (which the ISO 3166 Maintenance Agency says “stop use ASAP”) to “exceptionally reserved”. The .SU ccTLD is also a bit odd in that it is the only code that does not (officially) have a nation-state (and hence a legal framework) behind it. In practice, I believe it falls under the Russian legal framework.The European Union (holder of .eu) is not a nation-state either, is it? Cheers, -- jra
in the gtld trade, the .eu hack and the .ps hack stand out as creative use -- the first used the existence of a reserved alpha2 for a currency, the second a statistical abstraction -- to solve two similar problems -- the non-availability of namespaces to de facto political jurisdictions. the arab league has attempted, without success to date, to replicate the .eu hack, and an attempt has been made, also without success, to re-purpose rather than retire an iso3166-1 code point, previously allocated to the united states and managed until withdrawn, by the insular affairs office of the department of the interior, for one or more indigenous polities of north america.
this just popped up in my fb feed (yes, i read rue89), apropos of the .su sub-thread. in keeping with the owen-knows-more-about-everything-than-i-do truism, one is free to ignore this and hold fast to owen's latest revealed wisdom:
http://rue89.nouvelobs.com/2014/09/15/lurss-existe-toujours-internet-cest-devenu-zone-254809 -e
Current thread:
- Re: Scotland ccTLD?, (continued)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? David Conrad (Sep 16)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? Roland Dobbins (Sep 16)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? Doug Barton (Sep 16)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? Måns Nilsson (Sep 16)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? Jaap Akkerhuis (Sep 16)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? Rubens Kuhl (Sep 16)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? David Cantrell (Sep 17)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? David Conrad (Sep 17)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? Jay Ashworth (Sep 17)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? David Conrad (Sep 17)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? Eric Brunner-Williams (Sep 17)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? Barry Shein (Sep 16)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? David Conrad (Sep 16)
- RE: Scotland ccTLD? Jamie Bowden (Sep 16)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? David Conrad (Sep 16)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? Tom Hill (Sep 16)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? William Herrin (Sep 16)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? Matt Palmer (Sep 16)
- RE: Scotland ccTLD? Keith Medcalf (Sep 16)