nanog mailing list archives

Re: 2000::/6

From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 10:48:06 +0100

On 12/09/2014 08:53, Tarko Tikan wrote:

I'm pretty sure it was a typo in the config, the prefix length had to be
/64 but was entered as /6 instead.


2000::/64 doesn't make much sense either.

Nick

Current thread:

2000::/6 Tarko Tikan (Sep 10)
- Re: 2000::/6 Alain Hebert (Sep 10)
  - Re: 2000::/6 Wouter Prins (Sep 10)
- Re: 2000::/6 Job Snijders (Sep 10)
  - Re: 2000::/6 Randy Bush (Sep 11)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Jared Mauch (Sep 11)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Randy Bush (Sep 11)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Tarko Tikan (Sep 12)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Nick Hilliard (Sep 12)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Tarko Tikan (Sep 12)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Owen DeLong (Sep 12)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Tarko Tikan (Sep 13)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Jimmy Hess (Sep 14)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Nick Hilliard (Sep 14)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Brett Frankenberger (Sep 14)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Tarko Tikan (Sep 15)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Owen DeLong (Sep 16)