nanog mailing list archives

Re: 2000::/6


From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:34:21 -0400


On Sep 11, 2014, at 9:24 AM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:

According to https://stat.ripe.net/2000%3A%3A%2F6#tabId=routing
"2000::/6 is visible by 79% of 92 IPv6 RIS full peers."
This problem has been solved.

do we mark it up to pixie dust, or do we get an actual post mortem?

I talked to folks at 3549, they had a few tickets on it that took care of that.

I know we are reviewing our “alloc-boundary” filter to prevent such a large prefix passing again.

- Jared

Current thread: