nanog mailing list archives
Re: 2000::/6
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 22:24:46 +0900
According to https://stat.ripe.net/2000%3A%3A%2F6#tabId=routing "2000::/6 is visible by 79% of 92 IPv6 RIS full peers."This problem has been solved.
do we mark it up to pixie dust, or do we get an actual post mortem? randy
Current thread:
- 2000::/6 Tarko Tikan (Sep 10)
- Re: 2000::/6 Alain Hebert (Sep 10)
- Re: 2000::/6 Wouter Prins (Sep 10)
- Re: 2000::/6 Job Snijders (Sep 10)
- Re: 2000::/6 Randy Bush (Sep 11)
- Re: 2000::/6 Jared Mauch (Sep 11)
- Re: 2000::/6 Randy Bush (Sep 11)
- Re: 2000::/6 Tarko Tikan (Sep 12)
- Re: 2000::/6 Nick Hilliard (Sep 12)
- Re: 2000::/6 Tarko Tikan (Sep 12)
- Re: 2000::/6 Owen DeLong (Sep 12)
- Re: 2000::/6 Tarko Tikan (Sep 13)
- Re: 2000::/6 Jimmy Hess (Sep 14)
- Re: 2000::/6 Nick Hilliard (Sep 14)
- Re: 2000::/6 Brett Frankenberger (Sep 14)
- Re: 2000::/6 Randy Bush (Sep 11)
- Re: 2000::/6 Alain Hebert (Sep 10)