nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation for Loopback Address


From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 13:37:28 +0700


On Oct 11, 2014, at 1:33 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <faisal () snappytelecom net> wrote:

I am trying to understand what is sub-optimal about doing so...Waste of Ipv6 space ? or some other technical reason ?

It's wasteful of address space, but more importantly, it turns your router into a sinkole.

(is a /64 address are a 'sinkhole' the only reason ? )

That's a pretty big reason not to use /64s.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

                   Equo ne credite, Teucri.

                          -- Laocoön


Current thread: