Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation for Loopback Address

[Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>]

On Oct 11, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <faisal () snappytelecom net> wrote:

> For Router Loopback Address .... what is wisdom in allocating a /64 vs /128 ?

In the BCOP, this is noted so that those who suboptimally address their p-t-p links with /64s can be consistently 
suboptimal by doing the same with their loopbacks, so that *all* their interfaces are sinkholes.  

But the BCOP also talks about /128s.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

                   Equo ne credite, Teucri.

                          -- Laocoön