nanog mailing list archives

Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules


From: Faisal Imtiaz <faisal () snappytelecom net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:28:48 +0000 (GMT)

Vendor Lock's... this is nothing new, it has been in practice since the beginning of the IT / Computer Industry...

We have seen this with Cables (old old days, Vax/PDP 11/ IBM Mainframes, well into the PC cycle), Floppy Drives, Hard 
Drivers etc etc etc...

To the best of my knowledge, none of this was ever won by argument with the vendor...This always changed with time...
When more and more people started deploying generic / non oem items, the vendors were forced to either turn a blind eye 
or forced to reconsider...

The big carrot or stick, the vendors always held with the Customers / Consumers, was the warranty and or support.

If history has any advice to offer, it would be, if you are not dependent on warranty or support issues from the 
Vendor, then go forward, do what you please, ..

:)

Regards.

Faisal Imtiaz

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Naslund" <SNaslund () medline com>
To: nanog () nanog org
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 1:20:09 PM
Subject: RE: A case against vendor-locking optical modules

Let talk about the 800 pound gorilla in the room and the #1 reason to hate
vendor locked optics.  Some vendors (yes, Cisco I'm looking at you) want to
charge ridiculously high prices for optic that are identical to generic
optics other than the vendor lock.  Maybe a better tactic would be to have
the vendor explain to you why the vendor lock is necessary.  You are after
all the customer and don't owe them any explanations.

Steven Naslund
Chicago IL

-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Jérôme Nicolle
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 12:12 PM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: A case against vendor-locking optical modules

Hello,

I'm having a discussion with Arista, trying to explain to them why I _can't_
buy any hardware unable to run with compatible optical modules.

My points are :

- I need specific modules, mostly *WDM and BiDi, some still unavailable in
their product line

- I run at least two other vendors on every locations and can't stack up
every spare optics for each of them, neither could remote-hands safely
re-program optics to match a specific vendor when needed.

- I have an established relationship with a trusted optics supplier,
providing support, warranty and re-coding hardware for their entire
(impressive) lineup. And this supplier is still 2-5x times cheaper than any
vendor-labeled optics even with NFR-like discounts.

Based on these points, I discourage every customers of ever using locked-in
equipments, and forbid them on my own network. Of course, Arista can't be
pleased because their hardware never stepped chord in my customer's
networks. But they seem to deliberatly miss my points every time the subject
comes up.

What are other arguments against vendor lock-in ? Is there any argument FOR
such locks (please spare me the support issues, if you can't read specs and
SNMP, you shouldn't even try networking) ?

Did you ever experience a shift in a vendor's position regarding the use of
compatible modules ?

Thanks !

--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14



Current thread: