RE: Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]

[Vitkovský Adam <adam.vitkovsky () swan sk>]

> From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mark.tinka () seacom mu]
>
> On Tuesday, May 06, 2014 11:27:09 AM Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
> wrote:
>
> > Segment routing (SR) could/would certainly work with single-stack v6
> > and enable MPLS forwarding.
>
> Certainly, but based on the Paris meeting, it was not high up on the agenda.
>
> So we will, likely, have to rely on other solutions and wait for SR to catch up
> later.
>
> At the moment, it seems SR is being pushed hard for PCEP as well as SDN.
>
> Mark. 


I think the most revolutionary SR use case is the: 
3.2.  Protecting a node segment upon the failure of its advertising node. 
Of the now expired: draft-filsfils-rtgwg-segment-routing-use-cases-02. 

It's the first, complete and elegant FRR solution for the hierarchical MPLS implementations. 

adam