RE: Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]

[Vitkovský Adam <adam.vitkovsky () swan sk>]

> > Ideally, we would have a solution where an entire MPLS infrastructure
> > could be built without v4 space, demoting
> > v4 to a legacy application inside a VRF, but the MPLS standards wg
> > seems content with status quo.
>
> There is work ongoing in the MPLS IETF WG on identifying the gaps that
> various MPLS applications have so they can be prepared for IPv6 MPLS
> control and data planes.
>
> Long overdue, if you ask me, but at least it's starting to get some attention.
>
> Mark. 

You mean the SR right? 

adam