Re: misunderstanding scale

[Warren Bailey <wbailey () satelliteintelligencegroup com>]

FYI He tells everyone they¹re cute. Don¹t buy his tricks, he doesn¹t call
back the next morning.

;)

Ps. Take it easy on each other. It¹s the beginning of spring.. Head
outside.. Go have a beer.. Smoke a joint.. What I am getting at is.. It¹s
possible you guys should relax and realize that in the grand scheme of
things a lot of this really doesn¹t matter.

Go be humans beings in the world, the internet and this flame thread will
still be here as it has been for generations (internet generations,
anyways..)

Just my .02

WOOOOOSAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH


On 3/24/14, 4:53 PM, "Randy Bush" <randy () psg com> wrote:

> > > > You propose stateless NAT64 as an viable alternative to CGN.
>    ^^^
> > > where do i do that?
> > Nick Hilliard
>
> ahh.  i see your error.  i am not nick hilliard.  he's the cute one.
>
> > Your reply (verbosity added for clarity): "[Sure it is! Unlike where
> > folks solve their problem with CGN, v6 to v4 protocol translation] can
> > be stateless."
>
> again, you put words in my mouth which were not there.  i did not say v6
> to v4 translation.
>
> > Nah, I'm done following bread crumbs for the day.
>
> cool.  then we can all go back to reality and whet people actually said.
>
> bye
>
> randy