nanog mailing list archives

Re: misunderstanding scale


From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:47:46 -0400

On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
You propose stateless NAT64 as an viable alternative to CGN.

where do i do that?

Nick Hilliard: "don't believe for a moment that v6 to v4 protocol
translation is any less
ugly than CGN."

Your reply (verbosity added for clarity): "[Sure it is! Unlike where
folks solve their problem with CGN, v6 to v4 protocol translation] can
be stateless."


The question stands: where are you planning to get the extra IPv4
addresses for the static 1:1 mapping?

maybe look at the +P in A+P

Nah, I'm done following bread crumbs for the day. Explain yourself or don't.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004


Current thread: