nanog mailing list archives

Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers.


From: Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:03:09 -0700

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Blake Hudson <blake () ispn net> wrote:


joel jaeggli wrote the following on 6/10/2014 1:10 PM:

 On 6/10/14, 10:39 AM, Blake Hudson wrote:

Łukasz Bromirski wrote the following on 6/10/2014 12:15 PM:

Hi Blake,

On 10 Jun 2014, at 19:04, Blake Hudson <blake () ispn net> wrote:

 In this case, does the 512k limit of the 6500/7600 refer to the RIB
or the FIB? And does it even matter since the BGP prefix table can
automatically be reduced to ~300k routes?

Te 512k limit refers to FIB in the B/C (base) versions of 6500/7600
Supervisors and DFCs (for line cards). BXL/CXL versions have FIB for
1M IPv4 prefixes.

You can find more information here:

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/
catalyst-6500-series-switches/117712-problemsolution-cat6500-00.html


And yes, you’re right - no matter how many neighbors you have, the FIB
will only contain best paths, so it will be closer to 500k entries in
total rather than N times number of neighbours.

 Please correct me if I'm wrong, but if the BGP table contains ~500k
prefixes, which are then summarized into ~300k routes (RIB),

Unlikely, just because prefixes could be cidr aggregated doesn't mean
they are. the more specifics exist for a reason, in the case of
deaggrates with no covering anouncement, well not much you're doing with
those.

your rib should be the sum of all received routes that you did not filter.

On the couple Cisco platforms I have available with full tables, Cisco
summarizes BGP by default. Since this thread is talking about Cisco gear, I
think it's more topical than results from BIRD.

One example from a non-transit AS:
ASR#sh ip route sum
IP routing table name is default (0x0)

IP routing table maximum-paths is 32
Route Source    Networks    Subnets     Replicates Overhead    Memory
(bytes)
connected       0           10          0 600         1800
static          1           2           0 180         540
application     0           0           0 0           0
bgp xxxxx       164817      330796      0 29736780    89210340
  External: 495613 Internal: 0 Local: 0
internal 5799                                            20123680
Total           170617      330808      0 29737560    109336360



I'm not sure you're reading that correctly.
164817+330796 = 495613

That is, the BGP routing table size is the
union of the "Networks" and the "Subnets";
it's not magically doing any summarization
for  you.

Matt


Current thread: