nanog mailing list archives
Re: Carrier Grade NAT
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 29 Jul 2014 17:52:42 -0000
As an ISP customer, would you really accept not being supplied a globally unique address? Really? I would not.
My local DSL provider does CGN. I switched to cable, but because it was faster, not because of the addressing. They would assign you a global static IP just by calling up and asking for it. When I left, I think they'd assigned 18 static addresses out of several thousand customers. Most consumer ISP customers don't run servers visible from outside, and don't care about CGN. Really. It's not because they're stupid, it's because it has no effect on their day to day usage. R's, John PS: End to end, is that a subchannel of Redtube?
Current thread:
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT, (continued)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Daniel Corbe (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Chris Boyd (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Matt Palmer (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Chris Boyd (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Chris Boyd (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Livingood, Jason (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT John Levine (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT William Herrin (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Robert Drake (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Simon Perreault (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Lee Howard (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Matt Palmer (Jul 29)
- RE: Carrier Grade NAT Tony Wicks (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Lee Howard (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Matt Palmer (Jul 29)