nanog mailing list archives

Re: Carrier Grade NAT


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:57:54 -0700


On Jul 29, 2014, at 9:42 AM, Chris Boyd <cboyd () gizmopartners com> wrote:


On Jul 29, 2014, at 10:23 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:

If law enforcement comes along without port numbers then you give them a list of subscribers behind that IP at the 
time. Use port block allocation and keep track of the blocks to reduce logging load.

There's probably going to be some interesting legal fallout from that practice.  As an ISP customer, I'd be furious 
to find out that my communications had been intercepted due to the bad behavior of another user.

--Chris

As an ISP customer, would you really accept not being supplied a globally unique address? Really? I would not.

Owen


Current thread: