nanog mailing list archives
Re: The case(s) for, and against, preemption (was Re: Muni Fiber and Politics)
From: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner () nic-naa net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:06:15 -0700
On 7/22/14 1:55 PM, Ray Soucy wrote:
You're over-thinking it. Use the power company as a model and you'll close to the right path.
Well, no, but thanks for your thoughts.Portland vs. Cumberland County as respective hypothetical bonding and regulating authorities, not {Bangor Hydro|Florida Power & Light|...} and Central Maine Power, generators and distributor, respectively.
Eric
Current thread:
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics, (continued)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Scott Helms (Jul 22)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Ray Soucy (Jul 22)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Keenan Tims (Jul 22)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Jay Ashworth (Jul 22)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Doug Barton (Jul 22)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Jay Ashworth (Jul 23)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 23)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics William Herrin (Jul 23)
- The case(s) for, and against, preemption (was Re: Muni Fiber and Politics) Eric Brunner-Williams (Jul 22)
- Re: The case(s) for, and against, preemption (was Re: Muni Fiber and Politics) Ray Soucy (Jul 22)
- Re: The case(s) for, and against, preemption (was Re: Muni Fiber and Politics) Eric Brunner-Williams (Jul 22)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Jul 22)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Ray Soucy (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Jay Ashworth (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics William Herrin (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Scott Helms (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics William Herrin (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Scott Helms (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics William Herrin (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Miles Fidelman (Jul 21)