nanog mailing list archives

Re: Muni Fiber and Politics


From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman () meetinghouse net>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 21:38:27 -0400

William Herrin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Scott Helms <khelms () zcorum com> wrote:
I'd say your experience is anomalous.  I don't know which township you're
in, but I'd suggest you focus on getting a set of more effective local
officials.
Sure, 'cause fixing local utility problems at the voting booth has a
long and studied history of success.  Who do I vote for? The officials
that allow rate increases and, when the utilities fail to fix the
problems, allow more rate increases? Or the officials who refuse rate
increases so that the utilities can't afford to fix the problems?

So where is it that you live Bill?  I sure want to avoid moving there.

As an aside, I used to do policy and consulting work for communities that were looking at telecom. builds - mostly for muni electrics. In general, I found the folks I worked for to be very competent, and focused on public service. Yes, there are incompetent, and corrupt, municipal utilities - but by and large they don't seem to be the ones trying to go into the telecom arena. It's more the folks in communities that have muni electric utilities because, 100 years ago, the big boys weren't interested in their market - so, god damn it, they went out and built themselves their own electric plant (also why there are lots of coops out there, and lots of independent telcos in Iowa). Today, those same folks are saying - if Verizon doesn't want to build it, screw it, we'll do it ourselves. Also, the incompetent and the corrupt, generally aren't interested in the political and legal battles they'd have to go through to get a project off the ground.

Cheers,

Miles Fidelman

--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra


Current thread: