nanog mailing list archives
Re: Open source hardware
From: Arnd Vehling <av () nethead de>
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2014 17:15:48 +0800
Hi, On 04.01.2014 21:07, Daniël W. Crompton wrote:
To my surprise I am seeing a theme fatalistic acceptance in this thread,
thats not really suprising. Then most poeple dont understand the implications "this" has.
A number have mentioned that if you are targeted there is little you can do, and this is something that I agree with to a certain extent.
Here i agree too. But i think it should be in possible to overload them by mass-creating fake data and honey pots. They dont have endless resources especially when it comes to decrypting. So, if just 10% of the "aware persons" start firing up "NSA honeypots" they get a resource problem and will fail at selecting targets.
// Arnd
Current thread:
- Re: Open source hardware, (continued)
- Re: Open source hardware Matthew Walster (Jan 02)
- Re: Open source hardware Jorge Amodio (Jan 02)
- Re: Open source hardware Andrew Latham (Jan 02)
- Re: Open source hardware Chris Russell (Jan 02)
- Re: Open source hardware Andrew Duey (Jan 02)
- Re: Open source hardware Jimmy Hess (Jan 02)
- Re: Open source hardware Daniël W . Crompton (Jan 03)
- Re: Open source hardware Darren Pilgrim (Jan 03)
- Re: Open source hardware Arnd Vehling (Jan 03)
- Re: Open source hardware Daniël W . Crompton (Jan 04)
- Re: Open source hardware Arnd Vehling (Jan 05)
- Re: Open source hardware TGLASSEY (Jan 06)
- Re: Open source hardware Andrew Duey (Jan 02)
- Re: Open source hardware Daniël W . Crompton (Jan 04)
- Re: Open source hardware Ray Soucy (Jan 03)
- RE: Open source hardware Raymond Burkholder (Jan 03)
- Re: Open source hardware Saku Ytti (Jan 03)
- Re: Open source hardware Benno Overeinder (Jan 04)
- Re: Open source hardware Saku Ytti (Jan 04)
- Re: Open source hardware Nick Hilliard (Jan 04)
- Re: Open source hardware Mark Tinka (Jan 04)
- Re: Open source hardware Vlade Ristevski (Jan 07)