nanog mailing list archives

RE: Route Server Filters at IXPs and 4-byte ASNs


From: Jakob Heitz <jakob.heitz () ericsson com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 19:26:35 +0000

I would support that.
http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-raszuk-wide-bgp-communities-03
How would you modify it?

To me, that draft looks hugely complicated, like everything you
could possibly think of was thrown in. I would support a simplified
version (and be able to code it without bugs) if it contained just useful stuff.
--

Jakob Heitz.

________________________________________
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 18:37:42 +0000
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
To: Sebastian Spies <s+Mailinglisten.nanog () sloc de>, nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Route Server Filters at IXPs and 4-byte ASNs
Message-ID: <52E40476.20200 () foobar org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 25/01/2014 15:48, Sebastian Spies wrote:
To make things worse: even if the IXPs ASN is 2-byte, I would assume,
that RS implementors chose to interpret extended community strings as
always being in the format 4-byte:2-byte (see RFC5668).

some ixp operators (e.g. me) are rather enthusiastic about the idea of a
modified form of draft-raszuk-wide-bgp-communities getting more traction.
This would solve this particular problem and many others.

Nick


Current thread: