nanog mailing list archives
Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:58:12 +0000
On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:52 PM, Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org> wrote:
(Business class) ISP's don't break PMTU-D, end users break it with the equipment they connect.
Concur 100%. That's my point.
So a smart user connecting equipment that is properly configured should be able to expect it to work properly.
In my deployment experience, many (most?) end-user organization break PMTU-D to/through their LANs outside of their IDCs, much less to the Internet, for themselves, and for everyone who wishes to communicate with them across the Internet. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Luck is the residue of opportunity and design. -- John Milton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Current thread:
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes, (continued)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Leo Bicknell (Jan 14)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 14)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Leo Bicknell (Jan 14)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 14)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Dobbins, Roland (Jan 14)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Leo Bicknell (Jan 15)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Dobbins, Roland (Jan 15)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Leo Bicknell (Jan 15)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Dobbins, Roland (Jan 15)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Leo Bicknell (Jan 15)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Dobbins, Roland (Jan 15)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 14)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Leo Bicknell (Jan 14)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Saku Ytti (Jan 15)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Martin Pels (Jan 18)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Jim Shankland (Jan 15)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Joe Abley (Jan 15)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Niels Bakker (Jan 15)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Christopher Morrow (Jan 15)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes William Herrin (Jan 15)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Michael Still (Jan 15)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Clay Fiske (Jan 15)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Niels Bakker (Jan 15)