nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Everyone should be deploying BCP 38! Wait, they are ...."
From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:12:22 -0500 (EST)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Vitkovsky" <adam.vitkovsky () swan sk>
Actually, it would be nice if someone who writes security software like NOD32 or Malwarebytes, or spybot, adaware, etc, would integrate it into their test suite. Then you get the thousands of users from them added to the results.I have just sent an email to ESET promoting participation on the BCP38 initiative by incorporating spoofer projects program in their program suite.
Absolutely. I've queried the PI on the ex-MIT ANA spoofing measuring project, prepatory to inquiring of the other projects mentioned above; we should all be pulling in the same direction, measuring the same things, with the same infrastructure if possible. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra () baylink com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274
Current thread:
- Changing the way we talk about BCP38 [Was: Re: "Everyone should be deploying BCP 38! Wait, they are ...."], (continued)
- Re: "Everyone should be deploying BCP 38! Wait, they are ...." Tony Tauber (Feb 18)
- Re: "Everyone should be deploying BCP 38! Wait, they are ...." Dobbins, Roland (Feb 18)
- Re: "Everyone should be deploying BCP 38! Wait, they are ...." Jay Ashworth (Feb 18)
- Re: "Everyone should be deploying BCP 38! Wait, they are ...." James Milko (Feb 18)
- Re: "Everyone should be deploying BCP 38! Wait, they are ...." Robert Drake (Feb 18)
- Re: "Everyone should be deploying BCP 38! Wait, they are ...." Jay Ashworth (Feb 18)
- RE: "Everyone should be deploying BCP 38! Wait, they are ...." Adam Vitkovsky (Feb 20)
- Re: "Everyone should be deploying BCP 38! Wait, they are ...." Jay Ashworth (Feb 20)