nanog mailing list archives
Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:38:32 +0200
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 05:08:02 AM Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
A lot of people use SUP720-3BXL and RSP720-3CXL for full BGP table routing. This will work just fine until the IPv4 routing table reaches 800k entries or something (if you want to do IPv6 at the same time, you probably don't want to go over 800k IPv4 routes and 50k IPv6 routes to have a little bit of margin of the around 1M routes the XL sup can handle).
Or route churn which quickly shows the inadequacies of the CPU in those control planes. An NPE-G1/G2 has a much quicker CPU. Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput, (continued)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Octavio Alvarez (Feb 10)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Vlade Ristevski (Feb 10)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Octavio Alvarez (Feb 10)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Geraint Jones (Feb 10)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Mark Walters (Feb 11)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Nikolay Shopik (Feb 11)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Vlade Ristevski (Feb 12)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Dan Brisson (Feb 12)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Blake Hudson (Feb 13)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 12)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Mark Tinka (Feb 13)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Mark Tinka (Feb 13)
- RE: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput John P. Schneider (Feb 10)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput joel jaeggli (Feb 10)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Mark Tinka (Feb 10)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Mark Tinka (Feb 10)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Nikolay Shopik (Feb 10)
- Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput Nick Hilliard (Feb 10)