nanog mailing list archives
Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today
From: "McElearney, Kevin" <Kevin_McElearney () cable comcast com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:06:45 +0000
http://www.zdnet.com/internet-hiccups-today-youre-not-alone-heres-why-70000 32566/ "According to NANOG, and complaints tracker DownDetector, many Internet providers — including Comcast, Level3, AT&T, Cogent, Sprint, Verizon, and others — have suffered from serious performance problems at various times on Tuesday.” While we had a few multi-homed customers have problems with their routers, we did not see anything in the core. Is this just a ZDNET reporting error? - Kevin On 8/12/14, 6:10 PM, "William Herrin" <bill () herrin us> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Hank Nussbacher <hank () efes iucc ac il> wrote:http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/catalyst-6500-series-s witches/117712-problemsolution-cat6500-00.htmlI note that the recommended command in that article, "mls cef maximum-routes ip 1000", will throw most of your IPv6 routes out of the TCAM instead. Which if you have any IPv6 traffic of substance just kills you in the other direction. Might want to try something more like "mls cef maximum-routes ip 900". Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com bill () herrin us Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> Can I solve your unusual networking challenges?
Current thread:
- So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Hank Nussbacher (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Hank Nussbacher (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today William Herrin (Aug 12)
- Re: ****SPAM:5.2**** Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Tom Hill (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today McElearney, Kevin (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Matthew Petach (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Jon Lewis (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today McElearney, Kevin (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Hank Nussbacher (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Hank Nussbacher (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Hank Nussbacher (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Warren Kumari (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Paul Ferguson (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Paul Ferguson (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today joel jaeggli (Aug 13)