nanog mailing list archives

Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post


From: Phil Bedard <bedard.phil () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:55:49 -0400

MSOs run expansive IP networks today, including national dark fiber DWDM
networks.  They all have way more people with IP expertise than they do RF
expertise. Even modern STBs use IP for many functions since they require
2-way communication, the last hold-out is your traditional TV delivery.
Even then most of the MSOs have IPTV installations in at least some
markets.  That pendulum tipped a long long time ago now.

Level3 actually had to pay Comcast the last time this all came around.
They gained Netflix as a customer, the ratios of traffic a "transit"
provider was sending to Comcast because way out of balance, and Level3
succumbed and paid.  Mainly since most of the traffic wasn't "transit"
traffic, it was Netflix traffic coming off Level3 CDNs.   Transit
providers have "double-dipped" forever when it comes to ingress/egress
traffic to their own customers.


-Phil



On 4/28/14, 9:05 AM, "Niels Bakker" <niels=nanog () bakker net> wrote:

Isn't this all predicated that our crappy last mile providers
continue with their crappy last mile

* jnanog () gmail com (Rick Astley) [Mon 28 Apr 2014, 05:08 CEST]:
If you think prices for residential broadband are bad now if you
passed a law that says all content providers big and small must have
settlement free access to the Internet paid for by residential
subscribers what do you think it would do to the price of broadband?

Lower it?

Right now broadband providers pay a transit provider who then get paid
by content providers to carry the bits, generally because broadband
providers don't want to think about running IP networks because they
their skills lie more in the television part of RF networks.

Content providers are offering to take out that middleman, bringing
everybody's cost down.  Some broadband providers think they deserve
more of a free ride than others.  It also happens that those broadband
providers are generally already more expensive than their competitors.


      -- Niels.

-- 



Current thread: