nanog mailing list archives

Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post


From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:04:43 +0530

So L3 and earlier, cogent peer settlement free with Comcast and Netflix
maxes out these peerings while they're there. What then?
On 28-Apr-2014 3:02 pm, "Jean-Francois Mezei" <jfmezei_nanog () vaxination ca>
wrote:

On 14-04-27 02:23, Rick Astley wrote:

Sort of yes, it's Comcasts problem to upgrade subscriber lines but if
that
point of congestion is the links between Netflix and Comcast then Netflix
would be on the hook to ensure they have enough capacity to Comcast to
get
the data at least gets TO the Comcast network.

Netflix has no business paying Comcast. It offers caching appliances,
and CDN distribution which can be either inside Comcast's network, or
close enough to peer with.  So Netflix not only pays for its own
connection to the internet, but also manages to pay for transit right up
to major ISPs.

Comcast has no business billing its suppliers. It is in business to bill
its retail customers.

Now, if Netflix were to charge more to Comcast customers and make a note
of this before every program starts "you are paying more because you are
on Comcast", you might see Comcast rethink its anti-competitive practice.





Current thread: