nanog mailing list archives
Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 19:36:30 -0400
I'm afraid we will have to agree to disagree. If you think things like "patent enforcement" == "government protected monopoly", we are at an impasse. I guess having the police keep people from breaking into their offices and stealing their computers is another form of government medaling we would all be better off without? -- TTFN, patrick On Apr 25, 2014, at 18:47 , Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net> wrote:
On 4/25/2014 8:23 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:On Apr 25, 2014, at 00:57 , Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net> wrote:I just posted a completely empty message for which I apologize.Larry is confused. He can claim he is not, but posting to NANOG does not change the facts. Then again, just because I posted to NANOG doesn't prove I'm right either. Worst of all, this thread is pretty non-operational now.In a private message I asked if he could name a single monopoly that existed without regulation to protect its monopoly power.I answered in a private message: Microsoft. Kinda obvious if you think about it for, oh, say, 12 microseconds."OK, so you are a troll. Microsoft is among the most heavily protected-by-regulation companies I can think of. Have you ever seen their patent collection? Can you guess at the size of their infringement-enforcement staff? Do you have any idea how many court-room hours are spent each day protecting their monopoly?" -- Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics of System Administrators: Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to learn from their mistakes. (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Current thread:
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post, (continued)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 24)
- Message not available
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Larry Sheldon (Apr 24)
- Message not available
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Larry Sheldon (Apr 24)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 25)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Jeroen Massar (Apr 25)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Daniel Taylor (Apr 25)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Jack Bates (Apr 25)
- Message not available
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Larry Sheldon (Apr 25)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Hugo Slabbert (Apr 25)
- Message not available
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Larry Sheldon (Apr 25)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 25)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Miles Fidelman (Apr 25)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Owen DeLong (Apr 26)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Jay Ashworth (Apr 27)
- Message not available
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Larry Sheldon (Apr 26)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Larry Sheldon (Apr 26)
- RE: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Hugo Slabbert (Apr 26)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Rick Astley (Apr 26)
- RE: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Hugo Slabbert (Apr 27)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Rick Astley (Apr 27)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Justin M. Streiner (Apr 27)