nanog mailing list archives
Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size
From: Ben <ben+nanog () list-subs com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:05:01 +0100
On 26/09/2013 09:52, bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:
sounds just like folks in 1985, talking about IPv4...
Most people here were probably not of working age in 1985 ;-)
Current thread:
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size, (continued)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Matt Palmer (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Owen DeLong (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Randy Bush (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 30)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size TJ (Sep 30)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 30)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size bmanning (Sep 30)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size bmanning (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Ben (Sep 30)
- Fwd: minimum IPv6 announcement size Alexander Neilson (Sep 30)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 30)
- RE: minimum IPv6 announcement size Lustgraaf, Paul J [ITNET] (Sep 30)
- Message not available
- Filter-based routing table management (was: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size) John Curran (Sep 26)
- Re: Filter-based routing table management (was: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size) William Herrin (Sep 26)
- Re: Filter-based routing table management (was: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size) Randy Bush (Sep 26)
- Re: Filter-based routing table management (was: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size) John Curran (Sep 27)
- Re: Filter-based routing table management (was: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size) Scott Brim (Sep 26)
- Re: Filter-based routing table management (was: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size) William Herrin (Sep 27)
- Re: Filter-based routing table management (was: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size) Steven Bellovin (Sep 28)