nanog mailing list archives

Re: Filter-based routing table management (was: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size)


From: Steven Bellovin <smb () cs columbia edu>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 19:10:29 -0400


On Sep 26, 2013, at 11:07 AM, John Curran <jcurran () istaff org> wrote:

On Sep 26, 2013, at 4:52 AM, bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:

sounds just like folks in 1985, talking about IPv4...

If there were ever were a need for an market/settlement model, it is with respect 
to routing table slots.

https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb/papers/piara/index.html, from 1997.

We even had a BoF at an IETF, but you can imagine the reaction it got.

                --Steve Bellovin, https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb








Current thread: