nanog mailing list archives
Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size
From: TJ <trejrco () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:46:51 -0500
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:32 AM, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:
<snip>
IPv4 jumped from 8 bits to
32 bits. Which when you think about it is the same ratio as jumping from 32 bits to 128 bits.
Only insofar as the jump from 1 to 1000 is the same as the jump from 1000 is to 1000000 ... :) /TJ
Current thread:
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size, (continued)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Randy Carpenter (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size joel jaeggli (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Randy Carpenter (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Matt Palmer (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Owen DeLong (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Randy Bush (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 30)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size TJ (Sep 30)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 30)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size bmanning (Sep 30)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size bmanning (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Ben (Sep 30)
- Fwd: minimum IPv6 announcement size Alexander Neilson (Sep 30)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 30)
- RE: minimum IPv6 announcement size Lustgraaf, Paul J [ITNET] (Sep 30)
- Message not available
- Filter-based routing table management (was: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size) John Curran (Sep 26)
- Re: Filter-based routing table management (was: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size) William Herrin (Sep 26)
- Re: Filter-based routing table management (was: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size) Randy Bush (Sep 26)