nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS Reliability
From: "Marco Davids (Prive)" <mdavids () forfun net>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:14:26 +0200
On 09/13/13 03:53, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 9/12/2013 3:25 PM, Phil Fagan wrote:Its a good point about the anycast; 99.999% should be expected.A small choice of attitude-reflecting language. I expect 100.000% I'll accept 99.999% or better.
It depends... define 'lost queries'. For example; is RRL included here or not (sometimes you want to deliberatly 'loose' queries). -- Marco
Current thread:
- DNS Reliability Phil Fagan (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability Bryan Tong (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability Beavis (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability Phil Fagan (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability Glen Wiley (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability Phil Fagan (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability Phil Fagan (Sep 12)
- Message not available
- Re: DNS Reliability Larry Sheldon (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability Marco Davids (Prive) (Sep 13)
- Message not available
- Re: DNS Reliability Larry Sheldon (Sep 13)
- Re: DNS Reliability Phil Fagan (Sep 13)
- Re: DNS Reliability Jean-Francois Mezei (Sep 13)
- Re: DNS Reliability Joe Abley (Sep 13)
- Re: DNS Reliability bmanning (Sep 13)
- Re: DNS Reliability Niels Bakker (Sep 16)
- Re: DNS Reliability Nick Hilliard (Sep 16)
- Re: DNS Reliability bmanning (Sep 23)
- Re: DNS Reliability Phil Fagan (Sep 12)