Re: DNS Reliability

[Phil Fagan <philfagan () gmail com>]

Its a good point about the anycast; 99.999% should be expected.


On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Beavis <pfunix () gmail com> wrote:

> I go with 99.999% given that you have a good number of DNS Servers
> (anycasted).
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Phil Fagan <philfagan () gmail com> wrote:
>
> > Everything else remaining equal...is there a standard or expectation for
> > DNS reliability?
> >
> > 98%
> > 99%
> > 99.5%
> > 99.9%
> > 99.99%
> > 99.999%
> >
> > Measured in queries completed vs. queries lost.
> >
> > Whats the consensus?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Phil Fagan
> > Denver, CO
> > 970-480-7618
>
>
>
> --
> ()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
> /\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments
>
> Disclaimer:
> http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/



-- 
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618