nanog mailing list archives

Re: comcast ipv6 PTR


From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () mykolab com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:36:53 -0700

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/14/2013 6:23 PM, Franck Martin wrote:

> If you want to block spam on IPv6, then you can start by rejecting
> connections to SMTP from any IPv6 that do not have a PTR. No need to
> analyze the format of the PTR.
>
> It is in several recommendations that a sending email IP must have a PTR.
>
> That ISPs will not do a PTR on all IPv6 but only on static IPv6, improves
> the spam blocking feature above. No need to maintain list of dynamic IP
> space...
>

...and Franck would know -- he rejects all mail from MTAs which do not. :-)

- - ferg


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 10.2.0 (Build 2317)
Charset: utf-8

wj8DBQFSXJwqq1pz9mNUZTMRAkJKAKCGLnO9qEGXv5LIKxCBiZhwf7HwHQCggksf
Fn3GhVzeKyHG5cSc7y5GXJw=
=Gtw1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Paul Ferguson
Vice President, Threat Intelligence
Internet Identity, Tacoma, Washington  USA
IID --> "Connect and Collaborate" --> www.internetidentity.com


Current thread: