Re: comcast ipv6 PTR

[Joe Abley <jabley () hopcount ca>]

On 2013-10-09, at 10:10, Chris Adams <cma () cmadams net> wrote:

> Once upon a time, Blair Trosper <blair.trosper () gmail com> said:
> > True, but the location information, at least the state, is quasi-helpful.
>
> That's another good reason to have reverse records for defined router
> interfaces.  Auto-generated reverse for eveything doesn't give any
> useful info though.

If people really want to use generic reverse names and have realised that the v6 address space is much too big for 
$GENERATE, one approach is to delegate the appropriate zones to a custom nameserver that can auto-generate PTRs on 
demand. There are scaling problems here, but probably nothing that can't be fixed with high TTLs and multiple 
nameservers.

If I was doing that, my instinct would be to code against Ray Bellis' evldns (see <http://code.google.com/p/evldns/>).

Note that I'm not suggesting that auto-generated v6 PTRs (or v4 PTRs) are a good idea. But I'm aware that a lack of 
reverse DNS on either protocol can make the helpdesk phone ring, so there is certainly a pragmatic argument in favour 
of it.


Joe