nanog mailing list archives

RE: Illegal usage of AS51888 (and PI 91.220.85.0/24) from AS42989 and AS57954 (in ukraine)


From: Warren Bailey <wbailey () satelliteintelligencegroup com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 15:27:35 +0000

Illegal or undesired?


Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device



-------- Original message --------
From: Adam Vitkovsky <adam.vitkovsky () swan sk>
Date: 05/06/2013 12:33 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: 'Nick Hilliard' <nick () foobar org>,'Christopher Morrow' <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Cc: 'NANOG' <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: RE: Illegal usage of AS51888 (and PI 91.220.85.0/24) from AS42989 and AS57954 (in ukraine)


-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:nick () foobar org]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 8:21 PM

From a deployment point of view, there's a pretty big gap between poking
around with rpki and actually dropping prefixes on your routers.  I don't
see that the rpki data will be good enough for the latter any time soon, but
maybe one day.

Well you can always jus lower the preference for a particular prefix based
on the roa state or roa missing.
Than it is solely up to your customers whether they bother to register their
prefixes to avoid hijacks or not, as you'll be ready on your part.

adam




Current thread: