Re: BCP38 needs advertising

[Arturo Servin <arturo.servin () gmail com>]

        And do not forget ....

http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp38

:)

-as
        

On 3/27/13 2:17 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> Please reference:
>
> http://openresolverproject.org/
> http://spoofer.csail.mit.edu/
> http://blog.cloudflare.com/deep-inside-a-dns-amplification-ddos-attack
>
> ...and anything else to raise the awareness level.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - ferg (co-perpetrator of BCP38)  :-)
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Alain Hebert <ahebert () pubnix net> wrote:
>
> >     bcp38.org coming soon =D
> >
> > -----
> > Alain Hebert                                ahebert () pubnix net
> > PubNIX Inc.
> > 50 boul. St-Charles
> > P.O. Box 26770     Beaconsfield, Quebec     H9W 6G7
> > Tel: 514-990-5911  http://www.pubnix.net    Fax: 514-990-9443
> >
> > On 03/27/13 11:20, Jack Bates wrote:
> > > Outside of needing more details and examples, BCP38 could use more
> > > advertising.
> > >
> > > The best option, if they would accept it, is to have all RIRs mention
> > > BCP38 as well as require that mention of BCP38 be included in all IP
> > > justification requests to customers (so that those who receive
> > > netblocks from their ISPs are also aware of it).
> > >
> > > For ARIN, at least, having it mentioned in the attestation process
> > > wouldn't be a bad idea. At least someone of management would be aware
> > > of it.
> > >
> > > The only issue is see concerning the RIRs is that they may object to
> > > it being out of scope to their duties. However, informing people of
> > > something is not requiring implementation of something. On the other
> > > hand, we know that there are a great number of networks that don't
> > > participate with the community at large and may have no idea about
> > > BCP38 and why it is important.
> > >
> > >
> > > Jack