nanog mailing list archives
Re: routing table go boom
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:07:25 +0900
William Herrin wrote:
Some local system is responsible for detecting connectivity between the ETR and destination and updating the destination-to-ETR map accordingly.Some local system?Yeah, you know, like OSPF or EIGRP. Just like exporting a route from the IGP to the EGP except that you're exporting a route from the IGP to the LISP map instead.
You assume an end user's network exchange route with its ISP. Though it causes a lot of problems, OK. Even then, that a route from an ETR of an ISP to an end system in end user's network is blackholed means that a routing protocol tells the ETR that there is a route to the end system. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: routing table go boom, (continued)
- Re: routing table go boom Masataka Ohta (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Sander Steffann (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Mike (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Matthew Walster (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Jared Mauch (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Jared Mauch (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Randy Bush (Mar 21)
- Re: routing table go boom Brielle Bruns (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Masataka Ohta (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom William Herrin (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Masataka Ohta (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Luigi Iannone (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Luigi Iannone (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Luigi Iannone (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom (was: Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification) Jared Mauch (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Doug Barton (Mar 19)
- Re: routing table go boom William Herrin (Mar 19)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification David Conrad (Mar 19)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Christopher Morrow (Mar 19)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification David Conrad (Mar 19)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Christopher Morrow (Mar 19)