Re: routing table go boom

[Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>]

Sander Steffann wrote:

> > As the ETR is not the final destination, it is subject to blackholing
> > after ETR, which means:
> >
> >    The function in question can completely and correctly be
> >    implemented only with the knowledge and help of the
> >    application standing at the endpoints of the communication
> >    system.
> >
> > Granted that it is no worse than multihoming by routing protocols.
> >
> > But, it merely means that neither BGP nor LISP works "completely
> > and correctly".
>
> Well, yeah, if your internal routing (behind the ETR) breaks
> then your network is broken...

No, what can break is internal routing of one of your ISP,
which is why you, an end user, want multihoming.

William Herrin wrote:

                                                Masataka Ohta