nanog mailing list archives

Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification

From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:02:09 +0900

Sander Steffann wrote:

Sorry, but that is false. Looking at the CIDR report
(http://www.cidr-report.org/as2.0/#Gains) the routing table
could shrink from 449k to 258k just by aggregating
announcements.


What if, NLIs are aggregated?

That's a reduction of 42.5%. I can't see how multihomed end-site
 announcements can be worst than that...


See "5.2. Limiting the Number of TLAs" of my draft.

Anyway... Drifting off-topic for this thread.


Current poor support for multihomed sites is a reason why
BCP38 is not operational.

                                        Masataka Ohta

Current thread:

Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification], (continued)
- - - Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] John Curran (Mar 20)
    - Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] Owen DeLong (Mar 20)
    - Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] John Curran (Mar 20)
    - Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] Owen DeLong (Mar 20)
    - Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] Jimmy Hess (Mar 22)
    - Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] William Herrin (Mar 20)
    - Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] Brielle Bruns (Mar 20)
    - Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification] Andrew D Kirch (Mar 20)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification David Conrad (Mar 20)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Sander Steffann (Mar 18)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Masataka Ohta (Mar 18)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Arturo Servin (Mar 18)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Arturo Servin (Mar 18)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Joe Abley (Mar 18)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Masataka Ohta (Mar 18)
    - Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Arturo Servin (Mar 18)