nanog mailing list archives
Re: huawei
From: Adrian <choprboy () dakotacom net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 15:55:24 -0700
On Thursday 13 June 2013 15:30, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 06:10:39PM +0200, Randy Bush wrote:we really should not be putting huawei kit into the backbone, there might be backdoors where they can spy on our trafficThis paper may be relevant to the topic at hand (h/t to Rob Slade): http://www.scribd.com/doc/95282643/Backdoors-Embedded-in-DoD-Microchips-Fr om-China
Extraordinary claims require extra ordinary proof. http://erratasec.blogspot.com/2012/05/bogus-story-no-chinese-backdoor-in.html http://www.csoonline.com/article/707542/china-not-to-blame-for-backdoor-in-us-military-chip Adrian
Current thread:
- Re: huawei, (continued)
- Re: huawei Saku Ytti (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Michael Thomas (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Warren Bailey (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Randy Bush (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Michael Hallgren (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei david raistrick (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Phil Fagan (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Eugen Leitl (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Jay Ashworth (Jun 14)
- Re: huawei Adrian (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Rich Kulawiec (Jun 14)
- Re: huawei Phil Fagan (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Michael Thomas (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Nick Khamis (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Scott Helms (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Michael Thomas (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Mark Gallagher (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Scott Helms (Jun 13)