nanog mailing list archives
Re: huawei
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:39:21 -0700
On 06/13/2013 09:31 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2013-06-13 12:22 -0400), Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:Do you think Huawei has a magic ability to transmit data without you noticing?I always found it dubious that public sector can drop them from tender citing publicly about spying, when AFAIK Huawei hasn't never actually been to court about it much less found guilty of it. It's convenient way to devaluate one competitor. I'm just not sure if it's actually legal in $my_locale to invent reasons to exclude vendor in public sector RFQs.
Er, um, there are more ways to spy than virtual wires back to the mothership... Mike
Current thread:
- huawei Randy Bush (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Phil Fagan (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Nick Khamis (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Saku Ytti (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Michael Thomas (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Warren Bailey (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Nick Khamis (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Phil Fagan (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Randy Bush (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Michael Hallgren (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei david raistrick (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Phil Fagan (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Eugen Leitl (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Jay Ashworth (Jun 14)
- Re: huawei Adrian (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Rich Kulawiec (Jun 14)