nanog mailing list archives
Re: huawei (ZTE too)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 21:41:48 +0200 (CEST)
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013, Bryan Fields wrote:
My objection to ZTE/Hauwei when I was at a cellular telco was just this. I said "there was no way I can agree with Chinese nationals having unfettered access to our network".
Why would anyone outside of the US agree to have US products in their network, using the same rationale? At least with China they don't pretend they're not spying on our own population.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: huawei, (continued)
- Re: huawei Phil Fagan (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Michael Thomas (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Nick Khamis (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Scott Helms (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Michael Thomas (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Mark Gallagher (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Scott Helms (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei Warren Bailey (Jun 13)
- Message not available
- Re: huawei (ZTE too) Bryan Fields (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei (ZTE too) Christopher Morrow (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei (ZTE too) Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 13)
- Message not available
- Re: huawei (ZTE too) Bryan Fields (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei (ZTE too) Warren Bailey (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei (ZTE too) david peahi (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei (ZTE too) Jeroen Massar (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei (ZTE too) david peahi (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei (ZTE too) Jeroen Massar (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei (ZTE too) Leslie (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei (ZTE too) Randy Bush (Jun 14)
- Re: huawei Randy Bush (Jun 13)
- Re: huawei William Herrin (Jun 13)