nanog mailing list archives

Re: .nyc - here we go...


From: Kyle Creyts <kyle.creyts () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 16:43:36 -0700

+10


On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>wrote:

Why does this discussion have to always be "one or the other"?

We have multiple problems here, friends.

Focus.

- ferg


On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Andrew Sullivan <asullivan () dyn com> wrote:

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net>
wrote:

Makes me wonder if concern for routing table size is worrying about the
right thing.


Because obviously, the problems of scaling router memory and scaling DNS
servers are the same kind?

Yes, having many many new TLDs introduces new problems.  (If you're not
scared enough, I encourage you to go read the output of the Variant
Issues
Project.  Full disclosure: I had a hand in.)  Why are we talking about
this
non-news now?  We all knew about three years ago, at the latest, that
ICANN
was planning to do this.  If we didn't, shame on us.

A



--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com




-- 
Kyle Creyts

Information Assurance Professional
BSidesDetroit Organizer


Current thread: