nanog mailing list archives
Re: .nyc - here we go...
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 10:00:38 -0700
--- rubensk () gmail com wrote: From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com>
Thank you for explaining this. Again, probably.
<snip> Summary: there are residual risks, but the checks and balances of the process are likely to stop bad actors, at the cost of also stopping some good actors. Error in the side of caution preferred. ----------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the explanation. I will begin to learn more about this. scott
Current thread:
- Re: .nyc - here we go..., (continued)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Paul Ferguson (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Andrew Sullivan (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Paul Ferguson (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Kyle Creyts (Jul 03)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Joe Abley (Jul 04)
- Message not available
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Larry Sheldon (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Mark Andrews (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Paul Ferguson (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... John Levine (Jul 02)