nanog mailing list archives
Re: De-funding the ITU
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 14 Jan 2013 18:24:44 -0500
1. I generally agree that the Internet has too much spit and duct tape, however; 2. Siccing the ITU on that problem - or allowing them near it - would be a disaster of a magnitude not often seen in human affairs.
No disagreement there. The Internet isn't designed to be a phone network. Regards, John Levine, johnl () iecc com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current thread:
- Re: De-funding the ITU, (continued)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Nick Hilliard (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Wayne E Bouchard (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Eliot Lear (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Owen DeLong (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Bill Woodcock (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Nick Hilliard (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Owen DeLong (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Nick Hilliard (Jan 15)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Eric Brunner-Williams (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU George Herbert (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU John R. Levine (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Eric Brunner-Williams (Jan 13)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Dave Crocker (Jan 13)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Eliot Lear (Jan 13)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Owen DeLong (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Dave Crocker (Jan 13)
- Re: De-funding the ITU John R. Levine (Jan 13)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Jimmy Hess (Jan 13)