nanog mailing list archives
Re: De-funding the ITU
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 22:43:08 -0800
On Jan 12, 2013, at 9:59 PM, <bmanning () vacation karoshi com> wrote:
its not that black/white. The ITU-R is actually -very- useful
I'm not sure I'd go so far as to say that, but we can't withdraw from it, which is why it's called out as an exception
in the petition.
-Bill
Current thread:
- Re: De-funding the ITU, (continued)
- Re: De-funding the ITU George Herbert (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU John R. Levine (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Eric Brunner-Williams (Jan 13)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Dave Crocker (Jan 13)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Eliot Lear (Jan 13)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Owen DeLong (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Bill Woodcock (Jan 12)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Dave Crocker (Jan 13)
- Re: De-funding the ITU John R. Levine (Jan 13)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Jimmy Hess (Jan 13)